Topic 35, 36, & 39 – Valuing Validity and Creating Consistency

In the context of topic 39, I substitute the term “reliability” with “consistency” because I find that it’s much easier to distinguish from validity in my head.

About Ellinor (she/her)

I'm a deeply analytical and hyper fixated person. The numbers' game governs my way of life. I'm always paying attention to the clock and planning my day accordingly. With that said, I also have a converse need to allocate as much time out of my day to certain tasks as possible. Allocating only one hour for a project which takes an hour to complete has never been enough for me. Even if it means devoting 12 hours of my day to a project which takes eight hours, I always prefer to leave room for something. That could be a stress break, or it could be an intermission of a snack. Most often, however, it's for the hidden art of getting side-tracked. My attention span has never been my greatest asset, but I've never seen it as an inherently bad trait for my work ethic. For as long as I'm able to capitalize on my distractions, they can serve as an immense learning tool.

One thought on “Topic 35, 36, & 39 – Valuing Validity and Creating Consistency

  1. Consistency shows that things actually work in real life. As researchers, it can be easy to make results abstract, but a lot of the time these things are effecting real peoples’ lives. If you can’t physically see the results over time, something has to be done.

Leave a Reply to ztgrelinger Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *