One good communication skill for managing conflict in the workplace is to not address the conflict immediately. Addressing conflict when it occurs helps to ensure it does not escalate and affect employee performance. It is important to be sure to not address it too quickly though. It is beneficial to carefully consider the situation first and give enough time for emotions to subside. Addressing it too quickly may carry more emotion than you intended and your demeanor alone could affect the performance of your staff. I sometimes have trouble managing my emotions. At times I respond to quickly which can keep others from hearing my preferences or opinions and puts them on the defensive. Other times, I can hold onto issues too long and not speak up until I am about to blow up. In such times, I again respond with too much emotion, which confuses the issue and blocks others from seeing my point.
One of my “hot buttons” is not listening well enough. I sometimes have trouble listening to co-workers or others because I’ve equated it with agreement or acceptance of what is being said. Just listening to another person is the first, and probably, the most important step in resolving conflict. In the future, by listening fully I will better understand the nature of the conflict and then can move on to problem solving. One way I can ensure that I have listened fully is to start any response with a paraphrase of what I thought I heard to see if it was accurate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8_n-QGwh-E
I agree, it’s hard to find that happy medium in time. All too often I seethe and nearly blow up which is not healthy either because I know that my nonverbal communication says “I’m really angry and could go off at any minute, do not poke this bear.” The leader sets the tone of the place. It is a horrible work environment when the leader is tense. It makes everyone tense, and by extension the patients are more anxious. Would you agree that things should be addressed within 24 hours? I find that by half of the shift I can set my emotions aside. Breathe in peace, breathe out peace.
I agree the leader sets the tone and it is a horrible place when the environment is tense. I am dealing with this currently at my job.
I can see the benefit of waiting to address the issue until emotions have subsided. Emotions can greatly impair communication especially when anger is present. Effective listening is critically important for communication to take place also. I believe that an effective way to negotiate emotionally charged disagreements is for both parties to write out their perception of the situation, feelings, and what kind of resolution they would like. This can be used if formal communication continues to break down, and is only applicable when time permits of course.
I agree! There is definitely a benefit to waiting to address the issue but waiting too long isn’t good either. Its difficult to find a happy medium. I have to wait a few days and think about it and get my emotions under control first before I address the issue. According to the Society for Human Resource Management, waiting too long to address conflict can be costly. Every unaddressed conflict wastes about eight hours of company time in gossip and other unproductive activities (Lytle, 2015).
Lytle, T. (2015). How to Resolve Workplace Conflicts. Society for Human Resource Management. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/Pages/070815-conflict-management.aspx