6 thoughts on “Zachary Grelinger Presentation Topics 37 & 38 – Empirical Validity and Judgmental-Empirical Validity

  1. Hi Zachary!

    I thought your presentation was really interesting. You explained things really well and I understood about Topic 37 and 38 a lot more while listening to you. Great job!

  2. It’s amazing that we both brought up the ACT as an unreliable source of validity. I personally don’t take standardized tests as anything other than a corruption of education. Nothing I answered within the span of 45 minutes can help me write presentations and assignments over the course of many days. Speaking of which, you’re a much better public speaker than me! I wish I shared your talents.

      1. Thank you very much! I just struggle to identify myself with much precision in real-time. Writing is a different story, but when I’m going from a set of mental notes, my speech gets pretty erratic.

  3. Hi Zach
    My topics 42 and 45 also dealt with validity and reliability. That seems to be a focal point when it comes to research methods in informatics. I like how you related a job you had in the past to demonstrate the topics of empirical and judgemental validity. Your presentation is well done and very understandable. It was tricky for me to try to post my presentation on the blog and had to provide a link. Is it easier to post on your youtube channel and attach it to the blog post?
    Heath

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *