This presentation is about Topic 40: Measures of Reliability and Topic 41: Internal Consistency and Reliability. I give examples and definitions.
Presentation: INF405_VA_Presentation1_Kayla Mickey
Youtube link: https://youtu.be/rZTqFU1a2w0
This presentation is about Topic 40: Measures of Reliability and Topic 41: Internal Consistency and Reliability. I give examples and definitions.
Presentation: INF405_VA_Presentation1_Kayla Mickey
Youtube link: https://youtu.be/rZTqFU1a2w0
I’m a pretty big stats nerd, so coefficients are right down my alley. The topics I take interest in always manage to have low coefficients though. Everything from reviewing archived sales figures to population prevalence seems to have a vague outline. It’s something that I always struggle with when writing broadcast print. I love specifics, but it seems that nobody else enjoys getting bogged down in details.
Hi Kayla
Good job on your presentation. Reliability and consistency are essential in performing research methods in informatics. Your presentation was very thorough and understandable. I like how you attached the presentation to the blog through your youtube presentation. I presented through PowerPoint and was told it was too large so I had to attach a link. Next time I will try YouTube.
Heath
I thought you could also export a PowerPoint as video but I’m not sure.
Using two tests to test out the same thing seems like a great way to ensure accuracy and reliability. Test-retest keeps results accurate and effective, I for one encourage this, especially for fields such as medicine where accuracy can cost lives.
Just did some reading on this for the quiz. The one thing I have really liked learning in this class are the different ways you can verify the validity of a study or the results of a study. Not an expert, but at least now I have a better idea of what to look for when someone quotes a study online when they make a claim.